Molemo “Jub” Maarohanye’s mom Ithuteng “Mom Jackie” Jaqueline Kabi Mpambani has requested an expression of remorse from entertainer Amanda Du-Pont and expressions and culture division representative Masechaba Khumalo later they referenced her in their allegations against her child last week.
Du-Pont and Khumalo took to online media, blaming Jub for rape later a hazardous meeting he did on Podcast and Chill with MacG where he said he had “crushed” Du-Pont.
In a video posted on Instagram, Du-Pont asserted she was “assaulted and actually and genuinely manhandled” by the star for a very long time. She likewise made a few claims against Mama Jackie.
In a legal counselor’s letter, Mama Jackie denied the cases and claimed they were “deliberately deceiving individuals from general society by expressing as well as inferring that our customer is a crook, our customer was engaged with disagreeable and false dealings with Oprah, that our customer has some hold over her child and that our customer rehearses with muti”.
“Our customer denies she was engaged with your relationship with her child and that she manages or has at any point managed muti,” the letter from BDK Attorneys read.
Mother Jackie’s legitimate group likewise sent a letter of interest to Khumalo, who said she was attacked by Jub “in Mama Jackie’s home in Naturena”.
“Our customer denies the claims evened out against her.”
The letter requested that Du-Pont and Khumalo eliminate the online media posts, stop sharing the charges, withdraw their assertions and freely apologize.
Demands for input from Du-Pont, her lawful group, and Khumalo were ineffective at the hour of distributing this article. Any update will be incorporated once got.
Mother Jackie’s legitimate group said assuming that the requests are not met in 48 hours they will move toward the high court.
It said the lawful move would likewise be made against the individual liable for the spilling sound of Mama Jackie talking with regards to her child and remarking on charges made by Du-Pont and Khumalo.
“She had sent that voice note on a private gathering and gave no authorization for it to be conveyed. She will likewise be making a legitimate move against the individual who distributed the voice note”.
–Style you 7